Letter to the Editor: Marblehead Village School Overspending

Marblehead resident Jack Buba sounds off on his belief that the town's School Committee renovated the Village School as proposed and then spent the more than $5 million they had left over.

Dear Marblehead Patch,

What would you say if you learned that the School Committee renovated the Village School as proposed and had over $5 million left over?  Great, right?  We can use that savings to reduce the cost of the new Glover School – Right?  WRONG.

In 2008 voters passed an override for $21.8 million for renovations to the Village School to replace the furnace and related systems, fix the roof, and comply with fire and safety guidelines.  The actual cost for this work was some $5 million less than anticipated.

Then, without telling you, the School Committee spent $5.4 million in savings on contract “change orders” - most which were unrelated to the original stated purpose of the project.  Marblehead Citizens for Fiscal Responsibility obtained copies of the 35 change orders and provides a summary below of some of these added costs. 

These include among other things, $809,000 for renovating the lobby and front entrance (which included $13,000 for a new lighted flag pole and $9,000 for a new clock face.)  Playground renovations included $10,000 for new four square courts and $269,000 was spent on kitchen upgrades. (You can go to http://cltg.org/marblehead.htm to see more details of this spending spree and other related documents.)

Village School Change Order Expense Summary







Front Entry




















Marker / Tack Boards










Teacher Rooms




Library Carpet




Grand Total


But the State is reimbursing 40% of the cost, right? WRONG again.

The State examined these change orders and ruled that they would only reimburse Marblehead for $364,000 of the $5.4 million in spending because the expenses did not meet their reimbursement criteria.  Marblehead taxpayers must pay 100% of the difference.

Additionally the state questioned the legality and magnitude of the change orders, stating that the Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA) “can only assume that the District [Marblehead] consulted with its counsel prior to pursuing the change-order[s].”   They went on to say, “[Marblehead] executed change orders far in excess of the available construction contingency  … such substantial changes to a project’s scope and budget are concerning and may warrant a new bid for the revised project … in order to ensure competitive pricing is obtained.”

On March 7th of this year well before Town Meeting and the Town Election, the MSBA made their concerns and reimbursement determination known in a letter to the Marblehead School Committee, the Selectmen, the Town Administrator, and to our state legislators, Representative Lori Ehrlich and Senator Tom McGee.  However none of this information was made public by any of these officials.

This is a total fiscal fiasco.  Who is watching how our tax money is spent? -  Not the School Committee, not the Selectmen, not the Town Administrator, not the Finance Committee.

Before voters approve any more spending, a complete audit of the Village School project is a necessity.  At the same time we need to know if any laws were broken, as the MSBA suggested that many of these changes required legal review to see if re-bidding was in order.

As a result of this breech of trust, there is no way we should give the School Committee any more of our money.  The Town and the School Committee need to account for their fiscal irresponsibility.  

Until then, just say no to the overrides.

Jack Buba

Palmer Road

 Jack Buba is a former Marblehead Finance Committee member and Treasurer of the Marblehead Citizens for Fiscal Responsibility.

Oldtown June 09, 2011 at 12:13 PM
I do agree that we need Glover replaced, but, frankly, our town government has shown an amazing amount of ineptitude in managing the Village School project. What makes you think it would be any better this time around? I can't blame the selectman, although a former selectman sat on the building oversight committee for the Village project and was directly involved in the change orders, but the school committee really blew this one. They have a responsibility to provide oversight here and, despitenall goodnintentions, they did a poor job. Dont get me wrong, I'll happily support Glover but we need to bring in outside, independent management offering complete oversight and transparency to the process, along with strong audit skills. There's too much glad-handing going on with these projects and too many people sitting in positions that border on conflicts of interest.
kristin king June 13, 2011 at 12:35 PM
It doesn't seem to me that abating asbestos, re-pointing brick, replacing inefficient windows and amending other deficiencies to extend the life of the Village facility is a misuse of funds. Marblehead did not "spend for no reason".
KlassySalem June 13, 2011 at 01:34 PM
The change orders had nothing to do with any of the issues you mention. They were in the original plan. The change orders were "hey, there's still money left, let's spend it."
kristin king June 13, 2011 at 09:16 PM
simply not true.
Jack Buba June 23, 2011 at 12:13 PM
Just look at the change orders. Even the state said that only a small fraction of them were germain to the original project. You can view the details of each change order at the CLT website.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »